FEM FATALE$ Rejected Rightfully & Progressively In America As Should | Condi Rice, Christine Lagarde: “Women of Power” >>

>> Honored by America’s Academia  ?  Really !

President Bush announcing 'mission accomplished'
two years into the American intervention in Iraq

Have we finished and then exited a mission that is 'accomplished?'

Have we achieved a peace in Iraq, while rooting out an elusive terrorist enemy in Afghanistan?

(Why JUST TODAY it is reported that 24 innocent lives have been taken by terrorists in Iraq as the Sunni insurgents try to disrupt the first democratically held elections since US troops departure in 2011.)

But the most horrific story that Cavanaugh's article deals with is the hundreds of thousands, yes HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS American troops that now suffer from severe emotional and mental distress.

This is making a nightmare for these returning serviceman, but is also an ongoing tragedy for their families, parents, spouses and children who must bear the unwelcome diurnal stresses placed upon them.   http://rjschwartz.blogspot.com/<<

https://swimwearstoriesinsider.wordpress.com/page/13/

The arrogance of Christine LagardeMAY2012

by representingthemambo in Current Affairs, Individuals worthy of contempt,Opinions, Politics 

>> http://representingthemambo.wordpress.com/2012/05/28/the-arrogance-of-christine-lagarde/

Upon hearing that the Mambo had decided to say some mean things about her, Christine Lagarde’s response was surprisingly juvenile. A senior IMF official was quoted as saying: “the difficulty is that Representing the Mambo is by far the best website ever. So when we get criticised in it’s hallowed pages, most of us just fucking listen. Christine just gets moody though.”

The American Condoleezza Rice, 60, Iraq War architect, and the French Christine Lagarde, 58, International Monetary Fund managing director, have little in common beyond being women of power who have contributed to the misery of millions of people they never cared to meet. And now they have another quality in common, cowardice under fire, albeit only verbal fire after they were invited to speak at college commencements.

Rutgers University invited Rice to speak (for $35,000 and an honorary degree) and Smith College invited Lagarde (compensation undisclosed).

Student and faculty objections to Rice started in February and continued to grow for months. The Rutgers administration held firm, Rice kept quiet. On April 28, some 50 students staged a sit-in at the Rutgers president’s office. The president refused to talk with them and they dispersed when Rutgers threatened to arrest them.

In a letter ironically foreshadowing his bald hypocrisy on free speech and academic freedom, Rutgers president Robert Barchi had written in March:

We cannot protect free speech or academic freedom by denying others the right to an opposing view, or by excluding those with whom we may disagree. Free speech and academic freedom cannot be determined by any group. They cannot insist on consensus or popularity.

Students and faculty objected to Rice for her participation in lying her country into war in Iraq, and even more so for her defense of widespread American use of torture in the “global war on terror.” An online petition by a 1991 Rutgers grad collected 694 signatures opposed to Rice, and campus petitions gathered hundreds more. In a lucid indictment of Rice’s apparent criminality, published in The Chronicle of Higher Education the day before Rice withdrew, Rutgers history professor Jackson Lears wrote:

Rice sanctioned the use of torture and has continued to defend it even after a top aide warned that she and her colleagues were violating the law. To invite her to address the Rutgers graduating class, and then to award her a doctor-of-laws degree, is a travesty of all the ideals the university embodies. Our students deserve better. Most of all, they deserve the truth.

Officially, Rutgers showed no interest in truth, history, morality, etc.

Rice did not engage issues like war or torture in her withdrawal statement, arguing instead that the crucial issue was the party-time nature of commencements. She said she was “honored to have served my country,” without mentioning any specifics. She did not explain why her controversial performance in office wasn’t as obvious to her in February as it became in May. Bowing out of the May 18 graduation as of May 3, Rice’s statement on her Facebook page read in part:

Commencement should be a time of joyous celebration for the graduates and their families. Rutgers’ invitation to me to speak has become a distraction for the university community at this very special time…. I understand and embrace the purpose of the commencement ceremony and I am simply unwilling to detract from it in any way.

Despite Rice’s belated withdrawal, Rutgers faculty and students went ahead with a planned, six-hour teach-in on May 6 because, as three participating professors wrote, “we concluded that the need remained for a scholarly exposition of Dr. Rice’s responsibility in the lies leading to the Iraq war and the implementation of the unprecedented torture policies under the Bush administration.”

In an exercise of actual academic freedom, Rice was invited to the teach-in when it was first planned, but she did not attend. President Barchi expressed the corporate position that Rutgers stood “fully behind” inviting Rice to the commencement (where only the speaker has freedom of speech). The teach-in (on YouTube) began shortly after that official statement, and the professors wrote:

It was an event that will be remembered because there has not been one like it for a very long time. The lecture room of the Student Activities Center was packed by a crowd of more than two hundred students and faculty members, many sitting on the floor, others standing anywhere they could, all listening with the utmost attention to the poignant speech of human rights attorney Jumana Musa, then to the illuminating exposés of our panelists, to whom Rutgers University – the real Rutgers – is forever indebted.

And we all stood up to applaud the six students who represented the ‘No to Rice’ movement that organized the demonstrations of the last ten days: the enthusiastic commitment they expressed to humanistic values was a reminder that there is real hunger among our students for more knowledge of history, of foreign cultures, of the very notion of ‘culture,’ of political science, of economics, as well as a deep interest in questions related to ethics, public policy and the place of media in our culture. Students like these give a special meaning – and responsibility – to our teaching and research.

Rutgers was against students learning about unapproved reality  CONTINUE READING >>  http://www.globalresearch.ca/condi-rice-christine-lagarde-women-of-power-honored-by-americas-academia/5382632 

By William Boardman  Global Research, May 17, 2014  Reader Supported News

Condoleezza Rice Tells Her Story [HOW TO A$$E$$ paranoid schizophrenic criminally insane?!]

WAR CRIMINAL

       ... pricked ITS' thumb and something wicked this way did indeed BIRTH A NEW MIDDLE EAST, and so evil a tanker came floating filled with OIL and BLOOD, named after IT

WAR CRIMINALS

"... When former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice walked into our interview at her publisher’s office in New York this week, she was as composed as ever — happy to be out of Washington and now free to tell her side of a tumultuous story ...

... She does not, however, give ammunition to Mr. Bush’s critics. She chronicles the missteps, noting in one famous instance that she “visibly stiffened” when the president declared during his first meeting with Vladimir Putin that he looked him in the eye and “was able to get a sense of his soul.”

... But she also offers numerous examples of President Bush acting in his self-described role as “the decider,” as when — on his instructions — she was the lone member of the U.N. Security Council to abstain on a 2008 resolution calling on Israel to end a retaliatory attack against Hamas in Gaza.

... “I told the president I would never trust Olmert again,” she writes, after the Israeli Prime Minister dismissed her in remarks afterward to the press. “It doesn’t matter, I told myself. We’re done.”
You don’t have to be a foreign policy wonk to enjoy some of Rice’s uncharacteristically candid assessments of the world leaders she encountered.

... “Early in his administration, President Barack Obama would say that in the days after the attacks in new York and Washington, the Bush administration ‘made decisions based on fear,’” Rice writes.

... “Well. Yes we did, but >>not from irrational fear or paranoia<<.”

Instead, she said, much was dictated by fear of the unknown.

>> It is only in retrospect – seen at least initially through the stories written by those who were inside the room – that we know exactly how much we had to fear then, and how little we know about what to fear next. <<

Gwen’s Take is cross-posted with the website of Washington Week, which airs Friday night on many PBS stations. Check your local listings.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/condoleezza-rice-tells-her-story/ 



[sidebar:

1.  HOW TO ASSESS A GREAT LEADER?

2.  A GREAT LEADER ALWAYS MAKES THE UNKNOWN OUR FRIEND!

3.  GOAL SEEKING PROBLEM SOLVING.

When the brain hasn't been compromised by, IE, oppression-suppression-repression-depression, then the THINKING STUFF isn't contaminated.  Critical Thinking happens.

Condi Rice has a serious problem.  She was-is a lawyer?  And also, a WAR CRIMINAL.

This is the problem with the paranoid schizophrenic criminally insane.

In THEIR 'mind/s' WAR CRIMINALS images are not exactly 'sane'.  Not that images in the brain/mind, can be altogether 'sane' in ANY human, especially with all the MKULTRA 'MIND CONTROL' via the IPHONE for only one example.

HOWEVER, we have now lived history.  That was what BUSH JR thought he bought, but he didn't.

We can now FORENSICALLY FOLLOW THE BLOOD, and know Condi Rice is a mass murderer, because that was what the BUSH-CHENEY-OBAMA Cult for the Global Mafioso was and is, and administration to steal all the wealth and kill all the flesh that doesn't succumb to the digital fraud slavery.  Apartheid-Genocide and Condi got paid big buck$ to do what has been done to the United States of America.

Problem with WAR CRIMINALS IS, what is inside that 'head' DECIDES to be in charge.

Brain Dead or worse, the holes eaten in the gray matter via YEARS AND YEARS OF 'WHITE DRUGS' and of course, ALCOHOL.  OR, in Condi's case, oppression-suppression-repression-depression and obviously a slave to be accepted in White America.

GEORGE W. BUSH 'JR' was dictated as the "Decider In Chief" via SCOTUS.  All Americans, then at that TYRANNICAL TIME, we should have all known in the U$A, the corporate criminally insane were not going to stop the insanity.  Got to stop the criminally insane and 'Condi' is such a bald faced bold as a GREAT pathological liar would-could-should -- she is insane, criminally.

Children in Iraq were being slaughtered while Condi purchased boots that cost thousands of dollars for one pair.

Because Condi has had the money to get the best cosmetic surgery and skin care plus other forms of youthing via science, doesn't cover the fact that she slaughtered men, women, children who were innocent so she could have a great big barge filled with the innocents' oil, and call her name immortal.  She is now immortal alright:  WAR CRIMINAL!
.. to be continued ...]

Recipe For A Failed Nation State: Condi Rice Et Al

Birth In New Middle East Welcomes the Vampire Condi Rice

Playing "CRIMINALLY INSANE QUEEN PIRATE ELIZABETH, O FAREWELL NOT USA'S QUEEN!"

[SIDEBAR:  "Black" USA people have been intentionally made into what IT is and IT ain't no Mozart so maybe this was the real 

problem of what IT didn't think about?!  STANFORD PROF?!

THE FACT, THAT, THE ITS' IT served in the GENOCIDE GLOBAL WAR ON TERROR were and are the same Mass Murdering of our own species that have been doing Africa forever in Apartheid Genocide.  In one word Condi, punt.   Playing piano for Queen Pirate ISN'T BUT a very tragic wanna be 'white'?  Chinese also think 'white-white' is very 'special'.

And YOU with all your  TWO THOUSAND DOLLAR BOOTS to wear while the children get to eat White POISON BOMBS.

AND, O MY 'Pink Pony' wannabes, sold USA to the Chinese via the story about how China and Russia were partners to participate in the 'birthing of a new Middle East'.

China and Russia noticed the truth wasn't what the Israeli so called government said.

And YOU with all your 'Pink Pony' wannabes stood on global earth world stage and acted as though Apartheid Genocide for YOU (cause you're 'black?!') was AND is, just another day riding high in Pink Pony land.

not being able to tell which is the enemy, or not?  IT IS THE FAILED NATION STATE, CONDI PUNT PINK PONY FOOL ALL THE TIME!

http://sparklepony.blogspot.com/2008_03_01_archive.html

... "our principles are respect for the rule of law .. We Need To End the Disastrous Failure Of The War On Terror .... "

This summary is not available. Please click here to view the post.

"SHOCK AND AWE" ~ "Condoleeza Rice committed to regime change in early 2002"

‘Shock and awe’ = terror

 

The Iraq War: Ten Years of U.S. Crimes against Humanity, By Sara Flounders Global Research, March 21, 2013, workers.org 

 

From the very beginning of  war preparation, U.S. plans were calculated to use the most extreme forms of terror on the Iraqi people to force submission to U.S. domination. “Shock and awe” is terrorism by another name.

 
“Shock and awe” is technically known as rapid dominance. By its very definition, it’s a military doctrine that uses overwhelming power and spectacular displays of force to paralyze and destroy the will to fight. Written by Harlan K. Ullman and James P. Wade in 1996, the doctrine is a product of the U.S. National Defense University, developed to exploit the “superior technology, precision engagement, and information dominance” of the United States.

This well-known military strategy requires the capability to disrupt “means of communication, transportation, food production, water supply, and other aspects of infrastructure.” According to these criminal military strategists, the aim is to achieve a level of national shock akin to the effect of dropping nuclear weapons on Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

War profiteers 

The looting and pillage of Iraq on a grand scale were also planned from the very beginning. It was hardly an accident, a mistaken policy or the fog of war.

The official who had total authority in Iraq immediately following  “shock and awe” destruction, the chief of the occupation authority in Iraq, L. Paul Bremer III,  enacted 100 orders which turned Iraq overnight into a giant U.S.-dominated capitalist free market. The 100 orders guaranteed 100 percent foreign investor ownership of Iraqi assets, the right to expropriate all profits, unrestricted imports, and long-term 30- to 40-year deals and leases. In the official turnover to Iraqi sovereignty, these colonial orders were to stay in place...

The cost of war

Nobel laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz calculated the cost of the Iraq war, including the many hidden costs, in his 2008 book, “The Three Trillion Dollar War.” He concluded: “There is no such thing as a free lunch, and there is no such thing as a free war. The Iraq adventure has seriously weakened the U.S. economy, whose woes now go far beyond loose mortgage lending. You can’t spend $3 trillion — yes, $3 trillion — on a failed war abroad and not feel the pain at home.”

Stiglitz lists what even one of these trillions could have paid for: 8 million housing units, or 15 million public school teachers, or health care for 530 million children for a year, or scholarships to universities for 43 million students. Three trillion could have fixed America’s so-called Social Security problem for half a century.

According to a Christian Science Monitor report, when ongoing medical treatment, replacement vehicles and other costs are included, the total cost of the Iraq war is projected to cost $4 trillion. (Oct. 25, 2012)

The Iraq Factor: Secret Memo to Tony Blair, Condoleeza Rice committed to regime change in early 2002, By Global Research, March 22, 2013, Raw Story and Global Research 14 June 2005

The leaked government Memo addressed to PM Tony Blair was dated 14 March 2002, one year before the invasion of Iraq.  It was first published by Global Research on June, 14, 2005. It demonstrates the complicity of Tony Blair in building a pretext to wage war on Iraq.

*       *       *
The following Memo addressed to Prime Minister Tony Blair is purported to have been written by Blair’s foreign policy advisor David Manning. It was written in anticipation of PM Blair’s Visit to the Texas Ranch.

It indicates that now-Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice was committed to “regime change” in early 2002. It also outlines some problems a postwar Iraq might face. The document is presented as transcribed by the “Raw Story”

SECRET – STRICTLY PERSONAL
FROM: DAVID MANNING DATE: 14 MARCH 2002
CC: JONATHAN POWELL
PRIME MINISTER
YOUR TRIP TO THE US

I had dinner with Condi [Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice] on Tuesday; and talks and lunch with her and an NSC team on Wednesday (to which Christopher Meyer also came). These were good exchanges, and particularly frank when we were one-on-one at dinner. I attach the records in case you want to glance.

IRAQ

We spent a long time at dinner on IRAQ. It is clear that Bush is grateful for your support and has registered that you are getting flak. I said that you would not budge in your support for regime change but you had to manage a press, a Parliament and a public opinion that was very different than anything in the States. And you would not budge either in your insistence that, if we need pursued regime change, it must be very carefully done and produce the right result. Failure was not an option.

Condi’s enthusiasm for regime change is undimmed. But there were some signs, since we last spoke, of greater awareness of the practical difficulties and political risks. (See the attached piece by Seymour Hersh which Christopher Meyer says gives a pretty accurate picture of the uncertain state of the debate in Washington.)

From what she said, Bush has yet to find the answers to the big questions:

• how to persuade international opinion that military action against Iraq is necessary and justified;
• what value to put on the exiled Iraqi opposition;
• how to coordinate a US/allied military campaign with internal opposition (assuming there is any);
• what happens on the morning after?

 
Bush will want to pick your brains. He will also want to hear whether he can expect coalition support. I told Condi that we realized that the Administration could go it alone if it chose. But if it wanted company, it would have to take account of the concerns of its potential coalition partners ... continue

The Iraq Factor: Secret Memo to Tony Blair, Condoleeza Rice committed to regime change in early 2002, By Global Research, March 22, 2013.

PNAC CONDI RICE ET AL

 They burn babies with their mothers

They maim young children

They kill mothers with their babies

"BIRTHING A NEW MIDDLE EAST"

They burn toddlers to death

Condoleezza Rice

"... Killery Klinton ET AL ...."